In spite of all the established advances of contemporary medicine, some people are attracted to non-traditional or “holistic” cures and practices. Many of these do no harm. As a cancer specialist observed in the past year, people undergoing cancer treatment will frequently try meditation or vitamins too. When such a practice is alongside, and not in place of, scientifically-backed treatment, this is usually not a concern. If it lessens distress, it can help.
But the proliferation of online health influencers poses problems that authorities and regulators in many countries have not fully understood. An investigation into a particular organization providing membership and advice to pregnant mothers has exposed numerous cases of third-trimester stillbirths or other severe injury connected to mothers or birth attendants linked with it. While the entity is headquartered in North Carolina, its reach is global.
“For whole populations, going through labour and birth without skilled support is associated with higher levels of risk for mother and baby,” as stated by a expert of midwifery.
Giving birth without medical assistance, sometimes called free birth, is permitted in nations including the UK and US. The potential dangers are not well understood due to a lack of reliable information. Childbirth can be a frightening prospect, and high-quality care is far from guaranteed. In England, a shocking recently published report found two-thirds of hospital maternity services to be unsafe or in need of improvement.
Criticisms of medical systems and specific, persistent issues with maternity care are in many cases justified. Many of the women spoken to for the investigation had in the past experienced distressing births.
But while mistrust of established systems may be rooted in experience, it has also proved to be a breeding ground for other influencers looking for converts to their unconventional methods and DIY ethos. During the pandemic, a “well-being” industry ostensibly focused on healthy living was involved in spreading lies about vaccines and feeding paranoia about official advice.
Worry is growing that such beliefs are acquiring more widespread traction. One presentation given at a medical symposium focused on misinformation, which it said had “acutely worsened in the past decade”. The inquiry shows that behind the image of an rebellious community lies an operation that trains women as social media influencers as well as birth attendants. The group does not present itself to be a certified medical provider.
There is no turning the clock back to a time when doctors were assumed to know best. Huge quantities of scientific research are published online and many people use these to positive effect. But there is also a critical necessity for protections from poor advice. It is well known that the algorithms used by tech companies promote more extreme content.
In the UK, necessary reforms to childbirth care cannot come soon enough. They must include the choice of home birth and the availability of clear information to support women in making decisions. Ministers and organizations such as the World Health Organization should also develop plans for the online information landscape so that science-based healthcare is not compromised.
A tech enthusiast and business strategist sharing insights on digital transformation and startup growth.